I Feel It 100% in My Bones

salvator mundi

Questions over its authenticity have raged over Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi for more than a decade. Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP.

The story that keeps swirling around this mediocre painting whose whereabouts is now unknown is a punch line that keeps on giving. New York art historian and dealer Robert B. Simon bought the “Salvator Mundi” from a New Orleans auction house for $1,175 in 2005. It was attributed to Leonardo in 2011. It sold at auction in 2017 for $450 million. Mr. Simon’s appeal to profound spirituality conveyed across time as the most compelling evidence for attribution to Leonardo is droll. But I also understand it.

“There are a host of reasons why I believe 100% in Leonardo’s authorship of the Salvator Mundi – most of all the inimitable style, unique iconography and phenomenal quality of the painting,” Simon told the Observer. “To these one could add the peculiarities of Leonardo’s technique, the relationship of the painting to autograph drawings, and the evidence of the work’s history. However, for me the most compelling reason to believe in the painting is neither scholarly nor scientific: it comes from its sense of profound spirituality that is conveyed from artist to viewer across 500 years.”

(Jamie Doward, “The mystery of the missing Leonardo: where is Da Vinci’s $450m Jesus?” theguardian.com, 10-13-19)

(c) 2019 JMN

About JMN

I live in Texas and devote much of my time to easel painting on an amateur basis. I stream a lot of music, mostly jazz, throughout the day. I like to read and memorize poetry.
This entry was posted in Commentary and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to I Feel It 100% in My Bones

  1. Eric Wayne says:

    I don’t believe that’s a real Leonardo, or at least not completed by him. If it is, than I can take solace that somehow he couldn’t line up the eyes properly, and made a nose that is way too long, has no bridge, and is too flatenned. The structure of the neck is only hinted at. These are the things are that quite difficult to achieve properly in portrait drawing/painting. I doubt da Vinci botched them so badly. You can look at a close up here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Leonardo_da_Vinci%2C_Salvator_Mundi%2C_c.1500%2C_oil_on_walnut%2C_45.4_%C3%97_65.6_cm.jpg


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.