“Painter of Disquiet”

Roberta Smith remarks that by a certain point in the show “it becomes clear why [Félix] Vallotton is not considered a first-rate painter. Perhaps he was excessively skilled with too many options at his fingertips.”

It struck me as a wry dilemma to have to cope with excessive skill, but perhaps I divine her point. She describes the Swiss painter and printmaker as “an intriguing, talented but slippery artist.”

[The exhibition] reintroduces an artist who achieved early greatness in the relatively modest medium of prints and then either failed or declined to follow a single path in painting.

(Roberta Smith, “When He Was Good, He Was Breathtaking,” NYTimes, 1-6-20)

Side note: A substantial part of this article describes paintings that are not shown. It teases the reader and makes him wish the gorgeous verbiage were illustrated by its subject.

(c) 2020 JMN

About JMN

I live in Texas and devote much of my time to easel painting on an amateur basis. I stream a lot of music, mostly jazz, throughout the day. I like to read and memorize poetry.
This entry was posted in Commentary, Quotations and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to “Painter of Disquiet”

  1. Eric Wayne says:

    Typical contemporary art criticism applied to much earlier work. Nowadays we are anti-skill, and what the art is should signify a single idea about art that any pinhead can wrap the apex of their head around. How utterly insipid!

    Personally, I used to find Vallotton bland, but I’m much more forgiving these days of more mainstream painting, much less so of mainstream criticism.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.