‘Shouldn’t Be Hard’ But IS

It shouldn’t be hard to agree that the highest purpose of the First Amendment is to protect speech we like the least — speech we are sure is pernicious, bigoted, obscene or potentially harmful to health.

Thus spaketh Bret Stephens, conservative opinion writer for the New York Times.

Can we also agree that another “high purpose” of the First Amendment is to defend speech that is true?

(“Speech We Loathe Is Speech We Must Defend,” New York Times, 7-11-23)

(c) 2023 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Unknown's avatar

About JMN

I live in Texas and devote much of my time to easel painting on an amateur basis. I stream a lot of music, mostly jazz, throughout the day. I like to read and memorize poetry.
This entry was posted in Commentary, Quotations and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to ‘Shouldn’t Be Hard’ But IS

  1. christinenovalarue's avatar christinenovalarue says:

    🖤

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.