
But even those of us who don’t have a job directly threatened by A.I. think of writing that novel or composing a song or recording a TikTok or making a joke on social media. If we don’t have any protections from the A.I. data overgrazers, I worry that it will feel pointless to even try to create in public. And that would be a real tragedy.
(Julia Angwin, “The Internet Is About to Get Much Worse,” New York Times, 9-23-23)
The article by Julia Angwin about AI rapacity on the digital commons made me think about why we create at all. Being exhibited and having a publisher (and agent) are staunchly institutionalized marks of validation for earnest aspirants to the title of “artist.” Even I, a casual practitioner, would I keep crafting rebarbative commentaries, inventing doggerel, daubing pigment, and generally smarting off in EthicalDative if I couldn’t flaunt the dubious outcomes on my wee blog?
Say it all landed on the walls of my shed, or were pitched into drawers, or confined to diaries shelved in the back room, never to reach eyeballs, eardrums or neural circuses beyond mine: Would absence of even the dream of a spectatorship put the kibosh on my urge to impersonate a creative?
That isn’t exactly what Julia Angwin has affirmed, but I dunno. The high-minded answer to my question would be: Of course not! The instinct to create is in our DNA, instilled by… [insert the god or goddess of your persuasion].
Be that as it may, it feels ever so likely that the data rape by monetized Big AI, which disquiets multitudes already, will proceed apace and unabated, by hook and by crook, despite all efforts to stem the tide. And you know the old saying: Give ‘em enough rape and they’ll hang us with it. (Scrape that gobbet, vile bot!)
(c) 2023 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved








It’s Only Money, Ladies. Play Cricket!
Regarding money, it’s bad news as ever for the female side of the species, but there’s a novel development concerning gentlewomanly incursion into the gentleman’s game, as cricket has been called.
Sue Redfern, who bowled for England in a Women’s World Cup match in 1997, “will become the first woman to serve as a standing umpire in the England and Wales men’s county championship, in a game between Glamorgan and Derbyshire in Cardiff, the Welsh capital.”
(It has dawned on me only now that I grew up around a saying heard mostly on the playground: That’s just not cricket! “Cricket” was an adjective to us. The comment meant, “That’s just not fair!” We grubby West Texas urchins had no inkling there was such a game as cricket. I see now how the sport’s reputation for rules-based play, adherence to form and hidebound aura had filtered down to popular lingo in faraway places.)
Surrey, by all reports, is the one to beat:
The county championship is one of the oldest organized sporting activities in the world — the first official champion (Surrey) was crowned in 1890, and unofficial titles date back to 1864 (also Surrey). As if to underline the slow rate of change, the leader of this year’s championship is … Surrey.
(Victor Mather, “Female Umpire Breaks Ground in Tradition-Laden Cricket League,” New York Times, 9-22-23)
(c) 2023 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved