Manly Love Trumping Other Love for the Moment, But Not in Poetry

Cigar this life and light it with the sun. / Breathe this poem in.

(From “Gratification to the survivors of daily damnations” by Oladejo Abdullah Feranmi)

The rest of Feranmi’s poem says this:

[…] Own a spot on a cliff or an edge
or somewhere that can carry a stamp of your body.
Become. Open a book and see this trapped time
I left for you to live all over.

“All over again” is the common voicing of that adverbial phrase. The writer’s omission of the final word is a canny stroke that lends broader reach to the poem’s ending.

Ascendent MAGA’s infatuation with the Putin-Xi-Orban-Meloni-Farage-Hogan mold of a man bodes ill in the near term for the love sadly labeled forbidden. “We’re going to unwoke the state,” says the new leader of the Wyoming State House, just to give you a flavor of what’s rumbling in the mountain meadows and high plains.

Still and all, be it that poetry makes nothing happen, as the poet wrote, poetry is happening smartly, nevertheless, in unconfined passion dimensions, and that’s not nothing. In fact it has long legs, because the poems featured in Poetry, January-February 2025, whose subtitle is Young People’s Poetry, are the work of cycle breakers who will outlive the administration’s dysfunction by decades.

There’s more tight craft, robust turns and singeing warmth in this issue than I was expecting. (I was going to say, “than I was prepared for,” but if I’m not prepared for it now, when? You prepare for poetry by falling down on your face in piles of it.)

Consider Vanessa Deering’s “so coffee is a laxative & i am writing this poem on the toilet.” That’s the title. The poem’s opening is a brisk setup:

in the building two women’s restroom & in the strangest places
i want to tell you the most mundane things
[…]

The singular “restroom” echoes what’s written on the door, not what syntax expects; it’s a tiny detail dropped precisely. The poem objectifies “what the sharpness of wanting you tastes like” around the extra squirt of vanilla in the speaker’s coffee proferred by a winking barista.

[…]
i finish my own sentences after walking you home
is it too early to say | my smile misses you? my smile’s smile | crescent
moony-gazed

[…]

In extolling the sheen of radiant eyes, the text resorts to the poetical adjective “gossamer” — best avoided, like “incarnadine,” in verse not meant to sound fusty — but the slip is redeemed by an ending I find revelatory:

[…]
like beesting,
i am afraid of my own swollen heart
i am so afraid for you

At first I read it as “beestings,” meaning the cow’s colostrum, a dense nutrient for the newborn calf. The context, however, suggests “bee sting.” The poem’s invigorating insight resides in the expressed fear of the heart beating in the speaker’s own breast, alongside the speaker’s fear for (!) the object of fresh attraction.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

‘Conjure an Exhale Instead’

I never knew why my uncle, a panhandle Texan, liked to say “the only good thing ever come out of Oklahoma was an empty bus.” He should’ve met Steve Leyva, who comes out of Oklahoma and is a good thing. Leyva’s poems, published in Poetry, December 2024, made me feel tossed in a blanket of strong language.

The one titled “Limerence” teaches me a word recognized in psychology for a kind of morbid craving directed towards a non-reciprocating person.

What do we call this desire
to be desired? The milkweed’s impenitent bow
to the monarch or starlight. The heart’s timpani

at a sundress, a thigh,
a braided anklet. A kind word escaping the cocktail
glass. An olive in brine. […]

The poem cycles through reasons not to adorn a self-flagellating longing with tags such as “beauty,” “love” or “happiness”:

[…] Name it beauty

and chase will become
our watchword. Call it love and the sun will kneel.
Say happiness and “Do I deserve this?”

follows, rapturous, like a sparrow
pecking the ground.
[…]

The chase after “beauty” calls to mind my French teacher’s mention of Proust’s l’être en fuite — the “entity in flight” whom the obsessive pursues precisely because the object of desire is unattainable. The sun’s kneeling at the mention of “love” is confounding. That the brightest body in our local firmament be deemed to humble itself before Cupid spikes the cheapened tag with hyperbole. Where “happiness” is concerned (“Do I deserve this?”), I do get a whiff of a certain kind of person in the grip of self-loathing who spurns entitlement even to a vestige of it. Deliver from, ye gods.

  The gnarly crux of the poem is what follows to the end. It posits a break-out strategy from self-torpedoing which begins with a stab at original thinking. Take the owl, folksy emblem of “wisdom.” Remember: The quest is to release the sufferer from limerence by an act of creative reassesment through naming.

[…] Instead of wisdom, why not
wish for the owl’s heart

at night, seeing in the dark
more than a meal, but a place to sing.
[…]

Yes, an apex predator of the avian persuasion will pierce something furtive and furry with its talons, tear apart and digest it before the sun rises. But hearty violence is followed by sated exultation. Let that be what it is: a restorative fallback on one’s own core of vitality.

Don’t imagine
a dirge for the eaten. Conjure

an exhale instead:
the hoot of being alive. Name it
whatever you like.

It’s almost an appeal to the bloody-minded revulsion over “woke”-ness that’s cresting in the likes of Wyoming. Break free of hackneyed sentiment and sloppy sympathies! “The hoot of being alive” is a bit of overreach, but Leyva’s entitled (he’s from OK).

I can’t process this text intellectually into crystalline clarity. It’s a poem, after all. It did, however, send a spark through me on first reading, and I pay attention to that. Perhaps I should have let it lie where it perched, darkly singing, but it ends with an imperative.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

How Fare the Wayfarers, Fled and Fleeing?

So the last shall be first

Wishing for all a home-finding; respite, refuge, safe harbour, dry land; where possible: cheer.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | 1 Comment

Three from ‘Twenty Years of Letras Latinas’

The planet is bursting with verse. A reader of poetry has to be arbitrary to stay afloat. In this post I’ve done something impudent, which is to apply strikeout formatting to text which I think would have been better omitted. My emendations aren’t knowledge-signaling; they’re just a symptom of constructive engagement with interesting texts. I’m sure I didn’t invent this thought — a poet must have said it: Starting a poem is (relatively) easy; ending it is the trick. Music is between the rests; poetry between the silences.

The folio feature of Poetry, December 2024, is titled “The Chorus These Poems Create: Twenty Years of Letras Latinas.” I was braced for a “Latinx” experience. What I found is a sequence of high-performing poems that evade x-ing. I long to take more than piecemeal account of such feats, but see my above remark about the planet.

Carnivore,” by Rigoberto González, has an italicized preamble referencing multiple sclerosis. The poem calls on the moose for a familiar emblem of sturdiness, but falls back on the gazelle: […] I’m supposed to be / upright and sturdy as a moose. / Better yet, a gazelle. I / used to walk so gracefully, / so elegantly in that animal / me. […] The speaker is prey to a wasting illness, but what’s central in the poem is loneliness over lost love: How my antelope nose soothed my buck’s / neck before he stotted away, / stomping out my heart […]. The poem’s conclusion is disarmingly specific:

He chewed it off just like
  I’m gnawing at the dead
gazelle of me. At night I detect
  thumping. Heartbeat or
hoofbeat, I can’t say. It creeps
  further away, memory of
a man who once loved me,
  hungering for the whole of me.
Oh I used to be more edible
  than this. And so mealy.

Searching,” by Jordan Pérez, instantiates a vegetable garden at the end of its productive life. The drama is captured perfectly by the tomatoes: […] The tomatoes, / believing they were near death, rushed to birth / fruit, and the very production took / the last life from them. The poem pivots on a query somewhat misaligned along a “body” semantic: Can you show me a body that is itself / whole? The ensuing turtle anecdote picks the poem up and carries it to a soulful ending:

[…] I think daily about the spotted turtle,
who I found trapped under the boardwalk[,]
and carried back to the water, only to later
read that, if she’s moved too far, will spend
the rest of her life searching for her eggs.
How is it possible to define yourself by waiting
for someone you have never met?

As Capitalism Gasps for Breath I Watch the Knicks Game,” by Yesenia Montilla, is a snappy fan paean to the New York Knicks basketball franchise: […] The ruckus of these players, the desire they / have to come in first. They rebound & strip like stickup / kids. […] The poem also reflects wryly on the anomaly captured in its title: […] Don’t get it twisted, capitalism is dying // & yet here I am rooting for boys bred to burn out their bodies / to make billionaires more billions. […] 

Here are the poem’s last 3 couplets:

What happens to the heart of a city when its people survive
on air; that space between the flick of the wrist & the swish

of a three-point buzzer beater? We fight for a win to fill
the ache of losing: Palestine, Congo, Sudan, Ayiti. We take

what we can, celebrate small victories until we win everything
we thought we never could—

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

The Thruster’s Emblems Are the Rocket and the Tower

The modality of our moment, roused, rising, risen, nigh on full erect, is that of the Thruster.

As it poured that small thought into a word mold, my self asked, “What’s the modality contrary to the Thruster?” Answer: the Chameleon. 

The very-brief-and-getting-briefer history of our species on this planet shakes out to Thruster versus Chameleon. 

Thruster is a gland spurt, Chameleon a let’s-take-a-look enzyme. 

Thruster’s only color is Thruster’s own color; Chameleon’s is who the hell knows. 

Chameleon is sort of a bunch of things where Thruster is much of his singular muchness. 

Thruster’d sooner grab a vulva as look at it. Chameleon’s a jester as likely to ape one.

Chameleon relates? Thruster dictates? Simplistic, but sort of rhymes.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged | Leave a comment

Song-Sketch: Larrupin’ Twang in a Man Hat

Attention, Nashville balladeers: Key of… why not?… C. I commend this hatchling of a hit (be sure to credit me) to the key of C. 

The key of C is the key musicologists explain least incompetently but most deludedly. After poetry, by the way, musicology is the discipline I quarrel with the most. Just as most attempts at making poems fail, no musicologist succeeds in explaining basic music theory.

The musicologist thinks <pronoun> should start with the simplest case: the key of C. As if, by acquiring an understanding of the simplest case, you will progress, more or less under your own power, to understanding the key of — I dunno, pick a letter: B? The entire project of musicology is built on a misconception as to how we learn. Do the hard part first. The easy comes later.

Here are my words:

Uncut calf in an old boy stetson
Fallen on hard tunes, drinkin’ on a dime,
Pretty girlin’ them country roads, sweet Sue
‘Neath a damn fine country moon so true
Tailgate’n longnecks, busted plumb UP
Got the DIS-stressed BE-spoke bluejean blues

Honey how did I
Did I ever
Ever let YOU outta my sight
Walk outta my Friday night?

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Sketch-Read: Patrick Dundon

See if
You can
Find the
Poem’s
Trigger
Pull it

(JMN)

Patrick Dundon’s “Gratitude” says this:

[…] Sure my mother did not hold me enough,
too tempted by the specter of satiety only alcohol can bring.

It’s a piece of important nonsense; a specter is terrifying, not tempting. And who has ever been “sated” by alcohol? This kind of statement is how a poem makes a play at being interesting. It lays down a dare: Figure that out.

The poem says it woke from a dream of a terrible storm to the sounds of a terrible storm. Then this:

[…] No one was there
to hold me, and I was happy. A little curtain of satisfaction
fell over my face while I lay there, wanting nothing.

“I was happy”! The poem got more interesting in a bracing zag away from the predictable. Didn’t you expect a pity party here?

The poem says “Jonathan asks me to send him a poem about gratitude.” 

At first, nothing comes to mind. All poems, I think,
are about lack: language’s inability to capture the real.

Meta-talk, meat for thought; a theory-adjacent enunciation setting up a narrative whose conclusion I really like. The poet sends Jonathan a poem about contentment instead. (“To thank takes work. You must risk foolishness to do it.”)

[…] Jonathan thanked me
for the poem. We both knew it was not what he wanted.

The poem concludes with a mini-explication of the poem that Jonathan received:

In the end, the speaker sees birds rising up
from gnarled trees and thinks, as they fly off,
I need to go there too. When really, the birds
should exist without the complication of need.
I tell Jonathan I will find a new poem, one
without desire, or, better yet, without birds at all.

That ending lifts me up, suggesting what I dimly perceive: that the purest expression of oneself distills one’s self away. Want nothing. See past depicting what you think you represent. Past the birds.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Start at the Center

Start at the center of the faceAnd work outwardsThe center’s where the features areWhat surrounds is just outline Start at the center of the centerAnd work out whatIs where the center startsWhat surrounds is more of that Stare at the … Continue reading

More Galleries | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Poetry Isn’t nor Is. It Happens or Doesn’t.

— For all the maimed and dead.

Happens on a Fuji
Happens on a Gala
Happens on a Honeycrisp
Happens on a Granny Smith
Halving the apple
Quartering the apple
Eighth-ing the apple
(Can you say that?)
Knife slides across skin
’Til skin gives in
Apple tears at the blade face
Surrendering to pieces
How did you say “tears”?

When it’s all over
Hands are sticky with…
How did you say “tears”?
Were you torn?
Yes you aren’t an apple
No you are

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , | 8 Comments

A Little Knowledge (I Refer to Mine) Is Dangerous (and Fun)

Espejismo Mirón. Charcoal. Paper.

Reiterating at the outset: The “little knowledge” I mention in my title is my own!

Novelist-Poet-Thinker-Dauntless-Traveler Gary Gautier recently touched in his blog on an engrossing philosophical quandary, mentioning an idea expressed by Immanuel Kant:

The idea that we have no access to objective reality but only our subjective models to work with is Kant 101.

Gary cites David Hume:

Hume had already emphasized that we have no access to the objective world…

The comments Gary develops in his post stem from his reading of the abstract of an article about Stephen Hawking’s abandonment of “belief in the ability of science to describe reality in favor of a model-dependent account of truth.” [The cited language is the abstract’s]. 

Gary takes what could be a scary notion and expands it in a positive direction in succinct, resounding terms:

… Because we share… common subjective strategies of organizing reality, we can communicate meaningfully… Science still gives… valuable, usable insights about our shared interpretation of reality… All the things we value are still valuable…

I haven’t read any of the great works of philosophy (Wittengenstein’s Tractatus lost me on page 2. Fools rush in!), but I’m most receptive to Gary’s raising of the topic and to his handling of it. It feels right and necessary to engage with such matters, especially in a time of civic mourning when the life of the mind reasserts its primacy.

I like to reflect on two slants to the concept of lack of access to objective reality which dawned on me. 

One slant is the implication that simply stating that we can’t get to it concedes that an objective (or “transcendent”?) reality exists; it’s locked away from us for assorted reasons. This seems to lead most readily in a theological direction; the Quran, for example, strongly affirms faith-driven submission to “the Hidden.” 

A second slant could imply that saying we’ve no access to objective reality is a way of saying that there is none; that, stated crudely, it’s possible we invent our world(s) in our minds — but let’s keep examining what we think we see as objectively as we can (it implies). (I heard in a BBC4 podcast that Dr. Johnson said to Boswell concerning claims that Hume’s idea was irrefutable, “I refute it thus!” and proceeded to slam his walking stick down on something lying in his path until it — the stick or the thing — shattered.)

I make no claim for the intellectual rigor of either of these “slants” as I’ve stated them, but I do find it extremely fruitful to think as deeply as I can, in an embracing frame of mind, about both approaches. One slant foments inquiry that presupposes a Creator, the other slant favors inquiry that doesn’t. Both are enriching. Down the line they may converge, led there in centuries to come by the progeny of Hawking. The long view must be taken, and the long view is in short supply in our moment.

The opportunities which both slants open up to creative thought have occupied reflective humans since our recorded origins. No models built over millenia of cogitation are disposable, be it said. Nihil humanum mihi alienum est. But let’s have no more analogs to crucifixion and burning at the stake. That behavior doesn’t help anyone think. Never has. Never will.

(c) 2024 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Commentary | Leave a comment