This article by David Quammen appeared on January 28, 2020, in the NYTimes. That seems a long time ago in light of what has transpired in February, March, and half of April; however, the article has aged well.
Quammen is the author of “Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic.” He offers glancing insights into the predicament of scientists whose work begs for the attention of what seems a resolutely heedless world.
That the virus emerged from a nonhuman animal, probably a bat, and possibly after passing through another creature, may seem spooky, yet it is utterly unsurprising to scientists who study these things…
One such scientist is Zheng-Li Shi, of the Wuhan Institute of Virology… It was Ms. Shi and her collaborators who, back in 2005, showed that the SARS pathogen was a bat virus that had spilled over into people. Ms. Shi and colleagues have been tracing coronaviruses in bats since then, warning that some of them are uniquely suited to cause human pandemics.
“We’ve been raising the flag on these viruses for 15 years… Ever since SARS.” (Peter Daszak, one of Ms. Shi’s longtime partners.)
The list of such viruses emerging into humans sounds like a grim drumbeat: Machupo, Bolivia, 1961; Marburg, Germany, 1967; Ebola, Zaire and Sudan, 1976; H.I.V., recognized in New York and California, 1981; a form of Hanta (now known as Sin Nombre), southwestern United States, 1993; Hendra, Australia, 1994; bird flu, Hong Kong, 1997; Nipah, Malaysia, 1998; West Nile, New York, 1999; SARS, China, 2002-3; MERS, Saudi Arabia, 2012; Ebola again, West Africa, 2014. And that’s just a selection. Now we have nCoV-2019, the latest thump on the drum.
(David Quammen, “We Made the Coronavirus Epidemic,” NYTimes, 1-28-20).
(c) 2020 JMN









Move Fast and Fix Things
In late January Kara Swisher paid tribute to Clay Christensen, who died that month at age 67. Christensen was a Harvard professor of management whose seminal book “The Innovator’s Dilemma” appeared in 1997. His ideas on “disruptive” technologies influenced the founders of many legendary startups in Silicon Valley.
Swisher writes that Professor Christensen’s innovative thinking “took a turn for the worse in tech.”
Silicon Valley failed to marry disruption with a concept of corporate responsibility, and growth at all costs became its motto.
Swisher sees the notion of destructive innovation crystallized in Facebook’s famous slogan: “Move Fast and Break Things.”
I have always wondered why the company chose those words. I have no problem with “move fast,” which Professor Christensen would not have quibbled with, since being nimble was a core competency that he touted. It was the word “break” that stuck in my head like a bad migraine.
Why use a violent and thoughtless word like “break” and not one more hopeful, like “change” or “transform” or “invent”? And, if “break” was to be the choice, what would happen after the breaking? Would there be fixing? Could there be any fixing after the breaking? “Break” sounded painful.
Christensen could inspire with snappy quotables. Swisher cites these:
“It’s easier to hold your principles 100 percent of the time than it is to hold them 98 percent of the time.”
“Decide what you stand for. And then stand for it all the time.”
(Kara Swisher, “Tech Loses a Prophet. Just When It Needs One,” NYTimes, 1-29-20)
(c) 2020 JMN