Smegma Boom of the 2020s in the Wisp Isthmus

(Continued from https://ethicaldative.com/2021/06/12/your-kingdom-has-dang-near-come/)

Astrid was the fatherless child of a tool-pusher named Kirk Frick. Her core story is that she franchised her way out of puberty to merge with a founding partner of Huff Pugh Fuchs. We’ll develop Astrid Frick Fuchs when we need her, but let’s do a little foregrounding first.

It was the fraught decade of the aughts. Trophy hunting was pitiful. All the wild game was virtually shot up. Sportsmen had to plink at domesticated prey to kill anything at all. In this bleak scenario a lucky GOB named Fred bagged a quasi-extinct tundra coney. As he emptied his clip skyward in celebratory gunfire, Fred inadvertently shot off his face.

A search party found Fred facedown in a puddle of smegma-like fluid. The icky ooze had exerted startling antisepsis on his effaced face. The mess of bone and tissue was still pink and vibrant.

They were fixing to trundle the cadaver back to town when a fella named Wayne noticed their dualie was sitting on empty. Fred was rapidly putrefying now on the Dodge’s tailgate. The party discussed thumbing a ride on the interstate. “Let’s try some of this stuff first,” Wayne said.

They scooped fluid into empty hooch cartons and dumped it into the dualie’s tank. It not only got them home, it tripled the truck’s rated MPG and improved its performance. News of the incident got around in good-old-boy circles.

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved.

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Your Kingdom Has Dang Near Come

(Continued from https://ethicaldative.com/2021/06/11/lets-imagine-you-successful/)

You believe the nuttiness sickening the land could be flared off by a good fracking. For a guy who will sue the “bejeepers” out of someone if provoked, you’re oddly comfortable with the word “butthole.”

You lead from closed-door meetings. “Absolutely not” is how you say “no.”

Did we mention you’re a man in this figment? There, we’ve said it. Step into the light. A woman risks being collaborative, unassuming, flexible, subtle, kind, empathic, modest, and strong. We can’t work with that.

You’re a stinker, Todd, but you’re not complicated. Mile wide, inch deep. Your life is a business plan. Here we float the standard disclaimer: If someone out there resembles you it’s not Nick’s fault. Give a nod of assent, that’ll do.

Now that we have a contract, let’s try to make you interesting. You descend from Astrid Frick Fuchs, a doyenne of the rentier class spawned by the smegma boom of the 2020s in the Wisp isthmus.

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Let’s Imagine You Successful

(Continued from https://ethicaldative.com/2021/06/10/branded-figments/)

Call you Todd. Or Rand, or Blake, or Trent, or Rock, or Chip. You don’t want just to make money; you want to invent money. You swing in and out of cocktail colloquies like a metropolitan Tarzan. “Let me stop you right there” is your conversation opener.

You’re a deacon in a megachurch with valet parking. In your view the Bible is fairly representative of God’s thinking. That thinking could evolve if the Lord wanted it to, but it doesn’t. Nowhere in the Good Book does God say don’t do this, and don’t do this, and don’t do this — and I’ll tell you later what not to do next. The Almighty thought stuff all the way through, and that was that. Rock of ages.

Your palaver has a coy gaminess. You give it ungreased to adversaries; they bend over and take it. If a subordinate underperforms in your estimation, you say he should find a better use for his right hand.

As figments go, you’re giving Nick a chubby, Todd. Even your favorite number is figmentary: bezillion. If your German car has a bumper sticker that says “Insured by Smith and Wesson” and one that says “My Boss is a Jewish carpenter,” your kingdom has dang near come!

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Branded Figments!

Branded Figments is where the Nickster hangs his tout’s cap. His slogan is: Business can be laughable, and still be business.

Are you unbranded or offbranded? Outgrown your brand? Hankering for bespoke? Talk to Nick Mansfield.

Nick can leverage you into an incredible BF fiction product. You don’t have to be a Kardashian to have aura. Let’s get mythical.

Imagine the guy who murdered an abortion doctor is holding a baby. What would the guy do if he knew the baby would grow up to be an abortion doctor?

Imagine a Texas governor who only acts mean to attract donors. He intends to spring kindness on his state any day now; to smite liberals with the ass’s jawbone of scriptural love.

That was just practice. Now, let’s imagine you successful.

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

‘Lamento de mujer — En la muerte de un poeta’

El mas de Reus. Foto que me envió Nuria.

[Translator’s note: The blog of Andrés Cifuentes, Eco Social… Ojo Crítico, led me to this tender sonnet by Francisco Álvarez Hidalgo. To my naive ear the cadence of iambic pentameter has an affinity with Señor Álvarez’s hendecasyllables. I apologize for “collywobbles.” It jolts the lyric’s earnestness, but I couldn’t let it go. I mull with interest whether what I read as an elegiac paean to close friendship, not romantic love, need be titled perforce a “woman’s” plaint.]

A Woman’s Lament
On the death of a poet

Tantas veces me hablaste de partida,
So many times you spoke to me of parting,
y en mi descuido no alcancé a entenderte;
and careless me, I didn’t understand you;
tus versos ignoraban a la muerte,
your verses showed no consciousness of death,
eran cantos de amor, gritos de vida.
songs of love they were, and shouts of life.

Pero al fondo eran sangre de la herida
But underneath they were blood of the wound
por donde el alma sus zozobras vierte;
from which the soul pours out its collywobbles;
eras el hombre alborozado y fuerte
you were the man of strength filled with elation
con su noche final reconocida.
who recognized the night of his finale.

Oh amigo, casi amante, sin contacto,
Oh friend, quasi lover, beyond contact,
has llegado al final del tercer acto
you’ve reached the very ending of act three
de tu drama, el telón ha descendido.
in your life’s play. The curtain has come down.

Apagadas las luces, persevero
The lights have all gone out, yet I remain
en mi sillón, pensando, compañero,
seated where I am, thinking, comrade,
que de nuevo saldrás, que no te has ido.
that you’ll appear again, that you’re not gone.

“Antología de Sonetos”
Francisco Álvarez Hidalgo

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Voice

Thomas Hardy and his first wife Emma had long been estranged when she died in 1912: her death prompted a series of poems which are viewed as being …

The Voice

This wonderful music by Thomas Hardy sends tremors. The translation is lovely. I savored reading each line, then reading its translation. I understand much more Italian than I thought I did!

Posted in Commentary, Quotations | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Travesía (12)

Whitman 1819 – 1892 [Image from www.allenginsberg.org]
Fulton Ferry Boat (Brooklyn, New York), July 1890 via The Library of Congress, Washington DC. [Image from www.allenginsberg.org]

Versión castellana del poema “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry” (1856) de Walt Whitman
English text at http://www.poetryfoundation.org
Spanish Interpretation by JMN

[Translator’s note: The whole of part 8 follows. The poem has 9 parts.]

(8)
Ah, what can ever be more stately and admirable to me than mast-hemm’d Manhattan?
Ah, ¿qué cosa jamás puede ser para mí más imponente y admirable que Manhattan rodeada de mástiles?
River and sunset and scallop-edg’d waves of flood-tide?
¿El río y la puesta del sol y las olas de borde festoneado del pleamar?
The sea-gulls oscillating their bodies, the hay-boat in the twilight, and the belated lighter?
¿Las gaviotas oscilando sus cuerpos, el barco de heno en el crepúsculo, y la gabarra tardía?

What gods can exceed these that clasp me by the hand, and with voices I love call me promptly and loudly by my nighest name as I approach?
¿Qué dioses pueden superar a éstos que me estrechan la mano, y con voces que amo me llaman de inmediato a todo volumen por mi nombre íntimo cuando me acerco?
What is more subtle than this which ties me to the woman or man that looks in my face?
¿Qué cosa es más sutil que esto que me ata a la mujer o al hombre que me mire en la cara?
Which fuses me into you now, and pours my meaning into you?
Lo que me fusiona con vosotros ahora, y os vierte mi significado en las entrañas?

We understand then do we not?
De modo que entendemos, ¿verdad?
What I promis’d without mentioning it, have you not accepted?
Lo que yo prometía sin mencionarlo, ¿no lo habéis aceptado?
What the study could not teach—what the preaching could not accomplish is accomplish’d, is it not?
Lo que no pudo enseñar el estudio — lo que no pudo lograr la predicación, está logrado, ¿no es así?

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Anthology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Inclusive Writing’

The French controversy over “inclusive writing” has surfaced.*

Cole Stangler, “France Is Becoming More Like America. It’s Terrible,” NYTimes, 6-2-21.
Annabelle Timsit, “The Push to Make French Gender-Neutral,” http://www.theatlantic.com, 11-24-17.

Here are examples that have been cited:

les musicien·ne·s (the musicians)
les idiot·e·s (the idiots)

This accommodation is meant to overcome a tradition of gendered languages that requires a roomful of musicians or idiots to be lumped into a masculine noun (les musiciens, les idiots) if there’s a single male amongst them. It uses a character variously called the “median-period” or “midpoint” (obtained on my Apple keyboards with shift+option+9) to confer equitable simultaneity upon the gender markers. Purists will still perceive a precedence issue, since the masculine marker comes first in this system.

I’m not sure how inclusive writing is meant to be read aloud, if at all.

Inclusive writing would work thus in Spanish:

lo·a·s músico·a·s (the problem is compounded by the gendered definite article: los, las)
lo·a·s idiotas (“idiots” is conveniently inclusive in Spanish)

English is comparatively ungendered. “Aviatrix” crashed long ago, and “actress” has largely assimilated to “actor.” There’s still a problem: traditional usage prescribes masculine pronouns and qualifiers for generic reference even with mixed assemblages.

Example: Each member of the jury must leave his phone at the door.

Contemporary usage is moving to “Each member of the jury must leave their phone at the door.”

Arguably, coopting the plural qualifier for a singular entity achieves perceived neutrality; however, it introduces (in my view) a potential for ambiguity of reference in other contexts.

Example: One of my friends said they were going to photograph their house. Who is photographing whose house?

I have often used the workaround “his or her,” but it can prove unwieldy in complex sentences:

“Anyone who wishes to raise his or her seatback table to give himself or herself more room may do so provided he or she no longer wants refreshment service.”

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Adoration of the Cat

This gallery contains 1 photo.

A hoary plot line of melodrama reduces the hero and heroine to dire straits; they’ve tried everything in their power to escape doom; the soundtrack crescendos in a minor key. “Pray,” he says. “It’s in God’s hands. Only a miracle … Continue reading

More Galleries | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Exponential Obscurity Rectified*

*Scruple dictates that I confess to having added to the fog of blather by blatantly erring in my attempt to run the numbers in the original post. A bright lad has shown me the light, and the revised numbers do indeed bear out Ms. Tufecki’s example of the imposing power of exponentiality.

Zeynep Tufecki’s NYTimes guest essay asserts the mathematical essence of the E-word being slung portentously by the credentialed Covid commentariat:

Increased transmissibility is an exponential threat. If a virus that could previously infect three people on average can now infect four, it looks like a small increase. Yet if you start with just two infected people in both scenarios, just 10 iterations later, the former will have caused about 40,000 cases while the latter will be more than 524,000, a nearly 13-fold difference.

(Zeynep Tufecki, “Covid’s Deadliest Phase May Be Here Soon,” NYTimes, 5-28-21)

Tufecki’s instantiation has a touch of the abstruse to it. Here’s how I run her numbers:

The “former” case:

(1) 2×1=2; (2) 2×3=6; (3) 6×3=18; (4) 18×3=54; (5) 54×3=162; (6) 162×3=486; (7) 486×3=1458; (8) 1458×3=4374; (9) 4374×3=13,122; (10) 13,122×3=39,366

The “latter” case:

(1) 2×1=2; (2) 2×4=8; (3) 8×4=32; (4) 32×4=128; (5) 128×4=512; (6) 512×4=2048; (7) 2048×4=8192; (8) 8192×4=32,768; (9) 32,768×4=131,072; (10) 131,072×4=524,288

I see startling difference, but how does Tufecki get her answers? What am I missing? “What we have here is a failure to communicate.”

C’mon, experts! Bring it home. We’re swamped already by a fog of blather from pandemonic cacaphones. Infect us with some clarity.

(c) 2021 JMN — EthicalDative. All rights reserved

Posted in Commentary, Quotations | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment